2 min read

Does balloon angioplasty improve local or systemic endothelial dysfunction in PAD patients?

Vasa 2021 Jul 8 The impact of percutaneous peripheral interventions on endothelial function Christos Rammos 1, Martin Steinmetz 1, Mirjam Johnstone 1, Anna Manzke 1, Julia Lortz 1, Olga Petrikhovich 1, Ulrike Hendgen-Cotta 1, Rolf A Jánosi 1, Tienush Rassaf 1 Affiliations collapse Affiliation

Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany.

Abstract Background: Treatment of symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD) through endovascular interventions is the primary revascularization strategy. Interventions restore perfusion but may cause severe injury to the vascular endothelium, which regulates vascular tone. Endothelial dysfunction is involved in the progression of cardiovascular disease, with higher incidences of vascular events. We aimed to determine the impact of percutaneous interventions on change in endothelial function. Patients and methods: Endothelial function was determined using flow-mediated dilation (FMD) before, the day after lower limb intervention with paclitaxel-coated balloons or stent guided interventions and after a six-month follow-up in the target limb, control limb and the systemic circulation in 42 PAD patients aged 70.2±9 years and 66% men. Additionally, macro- and microvascular function were assessed. Results: In PAD patients aged 70.2±9 years and 66% men, we observed an immediate enhancement of macro-, microvascular and endothelial function after endovascular treatment (FMD of superficial femoral artery (SFA) 3.7±0.2% to 4.1±0.1%, n=42, p=0.02), a sustained long-term improvement after 6-months (FMD SFA 3.7±0.2% to 4.2±0.1%, n=42, p=0.01), and moreover an improved systemic endothelial function (FMD brachial artery 4.3±0.1% to 4.7±0.2, n=42, p=0.01) following peripheral interventions. Subgroup analysis however revealed that following paclitaxel-based percutaneous intervention, the paclitaxel dosage applied was inversely related to the chronic improvement in local endothelial function (r=-0.6, n=22, p=0.005) without evidence for systemic effects (r=-0.25, p=0.27). Conclusions: We demonstrate an improved local and systemic endothelial function after treatment of atherosclerotic peripheral disease with a distinguished response after endovascular intervention with higher dosage of applied paclitaxel restraining the benefits. Further studies have to determine the optimal interventional strategy with respect to different treatment modalities to maintain vessel functions. Keywords: Vascular functions; endothelial dysfunction; endovascular treatment; peripheral interventions. VIEW