Jeffrey T Kuvin 1, Ayan R Patel, Kathleen A Sliney, Natesa G Pandian, Jacob Sheffy, Robert P Schnall, Richard H Karas, James E Udelson
Affiliations expand
PMID: 12851627
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00094-2
Abstract Background: Abnormalities in pulse wave amplitude (PWA) have been described in subjects with atherosclerosis and may be a marker of future cardiac events. We evaluated the relationship between changes in PWA of the finger and peripheral endothelial function. Methods: We performed measurements of PWA with a novel finger plethysmograph (peripheral arterial tonometry [PAT]) and compared the findings with a simultaneous noninvasive measurement of peripheral endothelial function with brachial artery ultrasound scanning (BAUS) in 89 subjects. The PAT hyperemia ratio was defined as the ratio of PWA during reactive hyperemia relative to the baseline. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) was defined by BAUS as the ratio of the brachial artery diameter during reactive hyperemia relative to the baseline. Sixty-eight subjects underwent exercise myocardial perfusion imaging (ExMPI). Results: Fifty-four men and 35 women were examined. There was a linear relationship between the PAT hyperemia ratio and FMD during the same episode of reactive hyperemia (r = 0.55, P <.0001). Subjects in the lowest FMD quartile had the lowest PAT hyperemia ratio, whereas subjects in the highest FMD quartile had the highest PAT hyperemia ratio (P <.001 for trend). Similar to BAUS, the PAT hyperemia ratio was more impaired in subjects with cardiovascular risk factors and in subjects with ExMPI studies that were indicative of coronary artery disease. Conclusions: Assessment of PWA with PAT demonstrates patterns of abnormality similar to that of BAUS assessment of FMD. PWA during reactive hyperemia is influenced by factors known to affect endothelial function, including cardiovascular risk factors and coronary artery disease. These findings support the concept that analysis of PWA with PAT during reactive hyperemia may be used to study peripheral vascular endothelial function.
Similar articles
Assessment of peripheral vascular endothelial function in the ambulatory setting.Kuvin JT, Mammen A, Mooney P, Alsheikh-Ali AA, Karas RH.Vasc Med. 2007 Feb;12(1):13-6. doi: 10.1177/1358863X06076227.PMID: 17451088
Peripheral vascular endothelial function testing for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.Jambrik Z, Venneri L, Varga A, Rigo F, Borges A, Picano E.Am Heart J. 2004 Oct;148(4):684-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.04.016.PMID: 15459601 Clinical Trial.
Noninvasive vascular function measurement in the community: cross-sectional relations and comparison of methods.Schnabel RB, Schulz A, Wild PS, Sinning CR, Wilde S, Eleftheriadis M, Herkenhoff S, Zeller T, Lubos E, Lackner KJ, Warnholtz A, Gori T, Blankenberg S, Münzel T.Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Jul;4(4):371-80. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.110.961557. Epub 2011 May 6.PMID: 21551420
Prognostic Value of Flow-Mediated Vasodilation in Brachial Artery and Fingertip Artery for Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Matsuzawa Y, Kwon TG, Lennon RJ, Lerman LO, Lerman A.J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Nov 13;4(11):e002270. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002270.PMID: 26567372. Review.
Testing endothelial function and its clinical relevance.Poredos P, Jezovnik MK.J Atheroscler Thromb. 2013;20(1):1-8. doi: 10.5551/jat.14340. Epub 2012 Sep 10.PMID: 22972428 Review.
コメント